The
Cold War ended nearly a decade ago. Pope John Paul II prayed last
January for an end to the 37-year-old U.S. trade embargo of Cuba. And
the Pentagon in May finally acknowledged the obvious: that Cuba's
emaciated army is no threat to the security of the United States or
any other nation in the Western Hemisphere.
But
old obsessions die hard, as the United States again finds itself
serving as a base for terror attacks against Cuba. In the past year,
American soil has been used for staging commando raids reminiscent of
an earlier era of assassination plots against Fidel Castro and
sabotage against Cuba's economy.
Like
those older operations, the new attacks have targeted both Castro
personally and civilian economic facilities inside Cuba. In spring
and summer 1997, a dozen or so bombs rocked Cuban hotels and
restaurants. Last fall, an alleged Castro assassination plot failed
when a yacht carrying the would-be attackers nearly sank off Puerto
Rico.
The
bombers apparently sought to scare away European and Canadian
tourists who have been flocking to the Caribbean island in record
numbers. Last Sept. 4, bombs exploded at three hotels on the Havana
waterfront -- the Copacabana, the Chateau and the Triton. At the
Copacabana, an Italian businessman named Fabio diCelmo was hit in the
throat by debris and died.
After
the Sept. 4 bombings, Cuban police broke the case. They arrested Raul
Ernesto Cruz Leon, a member of a Salvadoran stolen car ring who
admitted his role in the terror campaign. Since then, the mastermind
has been identified as CIA-trained Cuban exile Luis Posada Carriles,
with money for the operation traced to Miami and New Jersey.
Yet,
despite evidence of U.S. connections to the conspiracies -- and a
federal criminal investigation that is reportedly under way into the
assassination plot -- this dramatic story of politics and terrorism
has drawn only spotty and often ambivalent coverage in the American
news media.
When
the Miami Herald reported that Posada, a renowned anti-Castro
extremist, was implicated in the hotel bombings, a headline made
light of his reputation as a painter as well as a terrorist. "Exile
conspirator's art is on canvas, in bomb plots," a headline read.
[MH, June 7, 1998]
During
the bombing spree last year, other U.S. press outlets mocked Cuban
charges of American complicity and incorrectly framed the story as
evidence of internal divisions within Castro's government. A Journal
of Commerce story even pondered whether "the dastardly deeds"
were the work "of the Cuban government willing to harm its own
economy so it has an excuse to crack down." [July 15, 1997]
A
St. Petersburg Times story saw the attacks as a sign of Castro's
decaying government. "The bombings, and Cuba's apparent
inability to catch the perpetrators, are attracting the attention of
political analysts and security experts who say Cuba may be
witnessing the first signs in decades of a home-grown terrorist
assault against the Fidel Castro regime."
That
same article quoted leaders of the influential Cuban-American
National Foundation as denying a hand in the bombings, but declaring
solidarity with "any act of internal rebellion" against
Castro. "We don't consider these actions as terrorism because
people fighting for liberty cannot be limited by a system that is
itself terrorist," declared CANF president Francisco Hernandez.
[St. Petersburg Times, Sept. 5, 1997]
Last
summer, the Clinton administration also disparaged Cuba's assertions
about a U.S. role. But in recent months, the administration has
clammed up about the mounting evidence that American territory, in
fact, did serve as a logistical base for both the bombing attacks and
an assassination plot against Castro.
Fishing
Trip
A
federal criminal investigation is focusing quietly on secret links
between armed terrorists and the CANF, including its president,
Francisco Hernandez. The New York Times reported that Hernandez and
another CANF leader have been informed that they are targets of a
probe into the 1997 assassination plot against Castro. Such a warning
often precedes an indictment. [NYT, May 5, 1998] The CANF, a
50,000-member political powerhouse in the Cuban-American community,
appears to be implicated in supporting Posada as well.
But
only luck put the current wave of anti-Castro terrorism into focus.
The federal criminal investigation started last Oct. 27 when a
Miami-based cabin cruiser, named "La Esperanza," was
foundering off Puerto Rico and radioed for help. The Coast Guard
responded and escorted the yacht to safety.
The
Coast Guard grew suspicious because the four Cuban exiles on board
insisted they were on a fishing trip, although the fishing gear was
still in plastic wrap. They also claimed they had sailed the 900
miles from Miami in a single day, an impossible trip.
Suspecting
drug smuggling, federal authorities searched the yacht. Under a loose
plank, they found a hidden compartment containing a cache of military
supplies: ammunition, fatigues, night-vision goggles, sophisticated
communications gear, tripods and two .50-caliber semi-automatic
rifles capable of firing flat-trajectory bullets one mile.
According
to a U.S. Custom investigator, crew member Angel Alfonso Aleman
blurted out that the weapons were his and that they were intended for
Castro's assassination. The crewman later denied making the
confession, but the yacht's navigational coordinates were set for
Margarita Island near Venezuela, where Castro was expected for a
summit of Latin American leaders.
The
political sensitivity of the case escalated when authorities
discovered that one of the rifles belonged to CANF president
Francisco Hernandez. "La Esperanza" was owned by Jose
Antonio Llama, a Bay of Pigs veteran who sits on the CANF Executive
Committee.
The
assassination case -- and the earlier string of bombings -- suggest
that some anti-Castro Cubans again are turning to violent tactics,
similar to those employed by Cuban exiles and their CIA sponsors in
years past. Since its founding in 1981, the CANF officially has
favored a strategy of using its money and voting power to force
tougher anti-Castro policies, while eschewing violence.
But
with its founder, Jorge Mas Canosa, dying of lung cancer last year,
the group appears to have grown impatient and switched to more
aggressive tactics. In Miami, there was speculation that the Castro
assassination plot might have been an attempt to fulfill Mas's
deathbed wish of outliving his longtime nemesis. But Mas died on Nov.
23, at age 58, having failed in his dream of ending Castro's rule of
Cuba.
The
CANF had no comment about the reported criminal investigation.
CIA-Trained
Terrorist
The
discovery of Posada's role in the 1997 bombing attacks added more
fuel to the politically incendiary mix. Posada was a CIA-trained
intelligence operative who had been jailed in Venezuela on suspicion
of masterminding the mid-air bombing of a Cuban civilian airliner in
1976, killing 73 people.
In
1985, with the reported help of Miami-based Cuban-Americans, Posada
escaped from prison. He traveled to Central America where he joined
Oliver North's secret Nicaraguan contra supply operation. After that
White House activity was exposed in fall 1986 -- along with Posada's
connection -- Posada fled to Guatemala.
In
Guatemala City, Posada was wounded in a shooting but recovered. In
his 1994 memoirs, The Ways of the Warrior, Posada recounted how his
friends in the CANF paid the $22,000 hospital bill. As Posada
hopscotched among Central American cities, he continued to be
supported by Miami-based Cuban exiles, who contributed to Posada's
welfare by paying top dollar for his paintings.
Posada
also appears to have benefitted from the Cuban-American community's
political clout. Though his whereabouts were exposed in 1986, the
U.S. government took no noticeable action to help bring the accused
fugitive terrorist to justice. Not surprisingly, once he recovered
from his wounds, Posada returned to his long-held passion for
anti-Castro terrorism.
In
1994, Posada reportedly plotted to assassinate Castro during a trip
to Cartagena, Colombia. Posada and five cohorts reached Cartagena,
but the plan flopped when security cordons prevented the would-be
assassins from getting a clean shot at Castro, according to a Miami
Herald article by Juan O. Tamayo and Gerardo Reyes. [MH, June 7,
1998]
Another
Posada plan to use Honduras as a base for commando attacks against
Cuba fell through in 1994 after four Cuban exiles met in Miami with
Pinel Calix, head of Honduran military intelligence, the Herald
reported. The Cubans apparently distrusted the corrupt Honduran
military and Pinel Calix reportedly was unimpressed with the Cubans.
In
the same article, the Herald detailed Posada's role in the 1997
bombing campaign against popular Cuban hotels and restaurants. The
story cited documentary evidence that Posada arranged some payments
to conspirators from accounts in the United States. "This
afternoon you will receive via Western Union four transfers of $800
each ... from New Jersey," said one fax signed SOLO, one of
Posada's aliases.
Much
of the Herald story, however, focused on the mishaps of the clumsy
conspirators who used diapers and shampoo bottles to smuggle plastic
explosives from Guatemala to Cuba for another round of bombings
scheduled for last fall. "The plan was a bust," the Herald
stated. "The explosive was apparently old and failed to explode
in tests."
The
Herald noted that Posada was disappointed even with the results of
the earlier explosions. To minimize panic, Cuba's
government-controlled press had given the bombings little notice. "If
there is no publicity, the work is not useful," Posada lamented.
But
the Herald observed that the bombings had one unintended benefit.
They touched off rumors in Havana and elsewhere that the explosions
reflected a split inside Castro's security forces and a possible
challenge to Castro's leadership. The speculation seeped into the
U.S. press coverage and ended only last September when Cuban police
arrested Posada's Salvadoran collaborator.
Provocations
Posada's
bombing spree and the muted U.S. reaction to it reveal anew
Washington's ambivalence toward acts of terrorism that are useful to
American geopolitical aims. For nearly four decades, the United
States has tolerated and even sponsored acts of political violence
against Cuba, with the goal of bringing down the Castro government by
nearly any means necessary.
In
line with that strategy, U.S. presidents from Dwight Eisenhower to
Bill Clinton have granted the anti-Castro Cubans leeway that few
other violent movements have enjoyed. That's partly because the CIA
recruited thousands of Cuban exiles into the shadow war, a strategy
that has always skated on the edge of state-sponsored terrorism.
Recently
declassified U.S. documents reveal that Kennedy administration
planners dreamt up a wide range of violent schemes to justify an
invasion of Cuba in the early 1960s. Brig. Gen. Edward G. Lansdale,
chief of the CIA's Operation Mongoose and one of President Kennedy's
favorite officers, drafted the top-secret plans and presented them to
the Joint Chiefs of Staff on March 1, 1962.
One
of the schemes was a "Remember the Maine" incident in which
"we could blow up a U.S. warship in Guantanamo Bay and blame
Cuba," the memo stated. "We could develop a Communist Cuban
terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even
in Washington. ... The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban
refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload
of Cubans enroute to Florida (real or simulated)."
Another
standby plan, called Operation Dirty Trick, proposed blaming Castro
if John Glenn's Mercury space flight crashed. The manufactured story
of Cuban sabotage would generate fierce public anger as well as
political demands for invading Cuba, the planners thought.
Though
the Joint Chiefs endorsed Lansdale's plots as "suitable for
planning purposes," it is not clear how far the planning went.
They did mesh, however, with other conspiracies, some involving the
Mafia, to murder Castro or, at least, to arrange his public
humiliation. [For more details, see NYT, Nov. 19, 1997.]
Business
& Politics
In
that over-heated climate of anti-Castro scheming, hard-core
paramilitary operatives rubbed shoulders with supposedly non-violent
political leaders. Mas Canosa, for instance, built his "closest
links to the American intelligence community [through] two of the
CIA's most effective and lethal operators," Felix Rodriguez and
Posada, according to a lengthy Mas biographical article in Esquire.
[Jan. 1993]
Mas
and Posada each joined Representacion Cubana en Exilio, which
congressional investigators later linked to the CIA. An FBI report
identified Mas as one of its leaders, who supervised anti-Castro
propaganda and planned military raids on Cuba. He allegedly once
handed Posada $5,000 to blow up a ship in the Mexican port of
Veracruz.
But
Mas channeled his energies into building a thriving business, too. In
1971, he borrowed $50,000 and bought a small construction company
which he renamed Church and Tower. He got a break when Southern Bell
contracted with his firm to lay cable and erect telephone poles, the
first step toward a personal telecommunications empire worth an
estimated $100 million.
Mas's
focus on business drew complaints from some of his old comrades that
he was insufficiently militant. When an explosion shattered the legs
of a newsman who had criticized terrorism, Mas felt threatened enough
to start carrying a gun and driving an armored car.
But
Mas also helped out Cuban exiles implicated in terrorism. When Jose
Dionisio Suarez Esquivel was connected to the 1976 car bomb that
killed Chilean diplomat Orlando Letelier and his co-worker Ronnie
Moffitt in Washington, Mas defrayed Suarez's legal bills. Mas also
contributed to the attorney fees for Guillermo and Ignacio Novo, two
other exiles accused in the Letelier/Moffitt murders.
After
the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, Mas saw a new opening for his
political ambitions. With White House blessing, Mas launched the
Cuban-American National Foundation as a political force to support
aggressive anti-Castro legislation and policies. Mas rapidly emerged
as the Cuban exile to see in the hotbed of Miami politics, a kind of
modern caudillo.
The
Reagan administration collaborated with Mas despite his strong
authoritarian streak. "He would lash out at anyone who appeared
soft on Castro," observed Alvin A. Snyder, who was a senior USIA
official in the 1980s. Mas demonstrated his clout when the Cuban
Museum of Arts and Culture in Miami auctioned works by some Cuban
artists who were selected by museum director Ramon Cernuda for their
talent, not their political views.
"Jorge
Mas saw this as subversive behavior and publicly threatened to use
his Washington connections to have Cernuda 'investigated',"
Snyder wrote in his book, Warriors of Disinformation. "Customs
officials raided Cernuda's home and office and seized some 200
paintings whose importation they claimed had violated the trade
embargo against Cuba."
Through
a variety of projects, the Reagan-Bush administration funnelled
millions of dollars to CANF. One of the biggest boondoggles was a $20
million-plus-a-year scheme to beam U.S. propaganda -- as well as TV
programs such as "Alf" and "Lifestyles of the Rich and
Famous" -- to the people of Cuba. Called TV Marti, the project
never succeeded in breaking through simple Cuban jamming procedures,
but continued because few Washington politicians dared to challenge
Mas's political clout.
Politically
savvy, Mas also understood the need to feather both the Republican
and Democratic sides of his Washington nest. In 1992, when Bill
Clinton emerged as a likely winner against George Bush, Mas raised
$300,000 for the Democratic contender at a single lunch.
Clinton's
Goal
Four
years later, running for re-election, President Clinton recognized
the political advantage in placating the potent Cuban-American voting
blocs in the swing states of Florida and New Jersey. Clinton got his
chance when Cuban pilots shot down two unarmed Cessna planes flown by
exiles who ignored warnings against buzzing the Cuban shoreline. An
outraged Clinton threw his support behind the hard-line Helms-Burton
embargo bill.
But
this year, Clinton has seen reasons to lighten up on Cuba. First,
Pope John Paul II visited the island and urged an end to the
punishing embargo. Then, on May 6, the Pentagon issued a report
declaring that Cuba's military was no longer a threat to its
neighbors. Its size had been cut by 50 percent and its readiness had
been reduced by a lack of supplies. The Cuban military is now "a
stay-at-home force that has minimal conventional fighting ability,"
the report said.
So,
with Cuba a toothless relic of the Cold War, Mas dead and his CANF
veering toward violent extremism, Clinton is faced with a new
challenge. He can demonstrate U.S. intolerance of any terrorism
launched from American soil while opening economic doors to Cuba --
or he again can turn a blind eye toward the exile violence and
continue the economic stranglehold.
Clinton's
choice could mark either an end to a long era of U.S.-Cuban
hostility, or it could be one more chapter in Washington's
near-four-decade determination to crush Fidel Castro, with the ends
justifying the means.